Wed. Apr 17th, 2024

Santa Ana City Council Member Thai Viet Phan, who represents Ward 1, is hosting a Town Hall meeting on Saturday, Nov. 13, from 1 to 3 p.m. at the Newhope branch of the Santa Ana Public Library, located at 122 N. Newhope St.

The Town Hall meeting will focus on Phan’s support for the Santa Ana Rent Control Ordinance and the Just Cause Eviction Ordinance.

The California Apartment Association is currently working on a signature gathering campaign in order to put a measures on the ballot so the residents can vote on these ordinances. If the referendum qualifies, the Santa Ana City Council will have two choices: Rescind the ordinances or put them on the ballot.

Tenants United of Santa Ana is having a cow over the signature gathering effort but just a few months ago they were asking their supporters to sign a petition to “let the voters decide the future of rent control in Santa Ana.”

“The California Apartment Association and a coalition of business groups, local housing providers and residents, believe the City Council rushed to impose these laws without any meaningful outreach to the community, analysis, or understanding of their impacts on the city’s finances or housing stock,” said Victor Cao, CAA’s senior vice president of local public affairs.

The city developed its proposals in secret meetings and with zero stakeholder outreach. The City Council also had to redo its initial vote on the measures because of alleged violations of the Brown Act, California’s primary open meetings law.

Santa Ana’s rent control proposal is stricter than those in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Santa Monica, and even Berkeley.

Some of the troublesome provisions in the rent control and just-cause proposals:

  • Rent increases capped at 80% of local inflation rate (CPI) or 3%, whichever is less
  • A limited and strict petition process for owners to get a higher rent increase.
  • Just cause eviction requirements starting on the 31st day of tenancy.
  • Prohibiting evictions of households with students during the school year.
  • Requiring the district attorney to prosecute an individual in order to evict for criminal activity.
  • Mandating higher relocation assistance payments to households beyond what’s in state law.
  • Undetermined and unlimited fees on landlords to fund the program development, implementation, and enforcement. Most cities with this type of program charge landlords over $100/unit.

Phan ran for her City Council seat with no opposition from the local Vietnamese American community. Our sources tell us that her constituents are furious at her decision to back rent control and just cause eviction. There is already talk of challenging her in Ward 1 when she runs for reelection in a few years. That is why she is hosting this Town Hall meeting. It is however highly unlikely that she will be able to mollify her upset constituents.



By Editor

The New Santa Ana blog has been covering news, events and politics in Santa Ana since 2009.

3 thoughts on “Council Member Phan will defend her vote for rent control and just cause eviction at a Town Hall meeting on Nov. 13”
  1. Hispanic renters in Santa Ana do not need rent control as they tend to live with five persons every 100 square feet and can afford almost any amount of rent with their tax free cash economy. Vietnamese people do not need rent control as they are higher earners per individual and enjoy paying higher rent in their better landscaped section of the city.

  2. Tenants United was circulating a ballot initiative in 2018 and 2020 to put rent control on the ballot BECAUSE the city council in 2018 and 2020 (with Pulido as mayor) refused to enact any protections for tenants in Santa Ana. The efforts for the 2020 ballot initiative were halted because of the pandemic.

    Things are totally different now in 2021 with the new council members who were democratically elected in November 2020 to represent all residents. The new council was open about their intent to enact tenant protections throughout their election campaigns as well as in all City Council meetings where the matter was discussed.

Leave a Reply to James Robert ReadeCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Verified by MonsterInsights