Mon. Nov 4th, 2024

I ran into a senior employee of the City of Santa Ana today, who told me that Cindy Nelson, the head of the City’s Community Development Agency, whose title is “Deputy City Manager for Development Services,” decided to retire on Friday of this week – and that this is public information.  Apparently her letter of resignation was received at City Hall and she is no longer an employee of the City.

Nelson made headlines recently when she refused to answer questions about the now-defunct trial valet parking program in Downtown Santa Ana.  She also has been clashing with the Santa Ana City Council over allegations that vast amounts of public money have been spent by her department, without Council oversight.   I just wrote about that yesterday.  You can read my post by clicking here.

I don’t know if her sudden retirement is due to her dispute with the City Council.  I have not verified this with any of the Council Members.

I suspected something like this was brewing but was still surprised by the suddenness of her retirement.

This comes at an awkward time as new California Governor Jerry Brown is making noise about getting rid of the many city redevelopment agencies in California, by taking their money, ostensibly to fill the State’s empty coffers.

I worked with Nelson many years ago when I was the head of Santa Ana Neighborhood Housing Services’s Board.  That organization is now known as the Orange County NHS.  She left the City of Santa Ana briefly a few years ago to work on the Nexus Towers project, then returned to the City when that project switched to rental units.

Nelson is a board member of the California Redevelopment Association.  Here is her bio as it appears on their website:

Cindy Nelson brings more than 30 years of community development-related public service to the Board. This will also be Cindy’s second time serving on the CRA Board.

She currently oversees Santa Ana ’s redevelopment and economic development programs as well as its community development and American Recovery and Reinvestment Act programs. She also manages the City’s Emergency Services Grant, federal job training, and business retention and attraction programs, and one of three WORK (Work, Opportunity, Resources, and Knowledge) Centers in the county of Orange . Cindy has more than 22 years of experience with the City of Santa Ana in two different stints. Prior to Santa Ana , she spent four years at the City of Long Beach as its Downtown Manager.

In Santa Ana , she has been instrumental in the expansion of the Bowers Museum as a world-class art institute; managed the development of Westfield MainPlace Mall; negotiated and developed the Santa Ana Auto Mall; initiated various commercial and residential loan programs; and gained approval for one of the first State Enterprise Zones and Federal Empowerment Zones.

Cindy’s first tour on the CRA Board was from 1991 to 2000, and she served as President from July 1993 to June 1994. She was also President for CALED during that same time period.

author avatar
Art Pedroza Editor
Our Editor, Art Pedroza, worked at the O.C. Register and the OC Weekly and studied journalism at CSUF and UCI. He has lived in Santa Ana for over 30 years and has served on several city and county commissions. When he is not writing or editing Pedroza specializes in risk control and occupational safety. He also teaches part time at Cerritos College and CSUF. Pedroza has an MBA from Keller University.

By Art Pedroza

Our Editor, Art Pedroza, worked at the O.C. Register and the OC Weekly and studied journalism at CSUF and UCI. He has lived in Santa Ana for over 30 years and has served on several city and county commissions. When he is not writing or editing Pedroza specializes in risk control and occupational safety. He also teaches part time at Cerritos College and CSUF. Pedroza has an MBA from Keller University.

10 thoughts on “Cindy Nelson, head of Santa Ana’s Development Services, opts to retire”
  1. Art, you can’t completely exonerate the Council and Mayor. That would be like saying the right hand doesn’t know what the left hand is doing when it comes to City governance. That would be its own special brand of dysfunction.

    1. The current Council didn’t hire the Reamers. In the few years that they have been in charge they have indeed been cleaning house.

      As for Pulido, he is now allied with a Council majority that is not going to take any B.S. from Ream and his Lieutenants anymore. As I have stated time and again the Council majority is doing good work, period. Amezcua and his goons are barking up the wrong tree.

      Where by the way are your kudos for Mayor Pro Tem Alvarez? She is showing great leadership and deserves to be recognized.

  2. “As for Pulido, he is now allied with a Council majority that is not going to take any B.S. from Ream and his Lieutenants anymore.”……. Hmmmm

    I am sure Pedroza that by now, as good student as you are, you have learn meaning of the Russian word bolševik — a member of a majority.

    So if the Pulido is now allied with the Council bolševiks it is bad news.

    However, Pulido was always align with bolševiks.

    Moreover, if you have such good sources in the city hall Pedroza, you may check a consternation brought by the alleged secret probe similar to the Sheriff Carona’s which lead to his expected departure to his timeshare gated community estate.

    I guess many are checking if they too invested into a gated community timeshare.

  3. Kudos Alvarez! kudos Mayor! we think? Who knows what to believe. It’s definitely good that the whole system is being shaken. The Machine does not exist in a bubble.

  4. Personally, I will miss Cindy Nelson and I appreciate her. She was always helpful and responded to my inquiries in regards to business questions and always did so with a smile on her face. So many times our government employees will never return phone calls or emails.

    As Mateo said, we never have the entire picture, and it was so easy for the council to use Cindy as a scapegoat and attack her in public view to make it seem like they were doing something.

    1. She made a big impact, particularly in the Downtown, but she did a poor job with regard to Council oversight. Her replacement will answer to the Council.

    1. What else am I to make of them? They have nothing positive to offer- only slanderous attacks on our Council.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Verified by MonsterInsights