Commentary: Arts in Politics and Vice Versa
By Omar Ávalos Gallegos, Santa Ana Sentinel
Art is tied to politics. Some of the greatest works of art have messages tied to all kinds of political topics including social justice, economic disparity, economic policies and history, just to name very few topics.
Politics are not only present in visual art, where they perhaps are most evident, but also in musical art. Politics occur when an orchestra conductor or a philharmonic society that he or she serves decides what music gets programmed.
Politics occur at music venues that deny a type o genre to be performed, or at movie houses that won’t show film genres, or at museums that won’t display visual art forms that they don’t see fit.
These two things, art and politics, are inseparable. That’s the way it works and always will.
With regards to the controversy over a proposed Santa Ana mural
A grand-scale project, like painting a mural, obviously has to go through a public approval and process of some sort. This wouldn’t be just any mural, it would be the largest ever painted in Santa Ana. Do you know that the City of Los Angeles even has a Mural Ordinance? In fact, Los Angeles even has a Department of Cultural Affairs and literature concerning mural processes including issues, rights & responsibilities.
It turns out that Santa Ana’s Planning and Building Agency has guidelines for Public Art processes. These sections in Chapter 15 are crucial to the development of a public artwork, like a mural.
15.3 PUBLIC ART GUIDELINES a. Public art associated with commercial development is encouraged. It is strongly encouraged that art should invite participation and interaction, add local meaning, interpret the community by revealing its culture or history, and/or capture or reinforce the unique character of a place.
Already, a problem is presented with the recent painting of a mural at Plaza Santa Ana. Based on PBA Chapter 15.1, said mural does not “add local meaning, interpret the community by revealing its culture or history, and/or capture or reinforce the unique character of a place.”
Fairness dictates that the following question be asked of the desingers / owners: How does that design add local meaning, interpret the community by revealing its culture or history, and/or capture or reinforce the unique character of a place?
Also, regard section 15.3.d:
Click here to read the rest of this article.
Yeah, thanks for the copy and paste of what we have already read on our own. Next.
You may have but this post has gotten a lot of hits here and we have sent many readers to his blog, which is why we posted this.
I meant little Omar’s copy and paste job. Sorry about that. The SAS is constantly boring.
LOL! I did take that the wrong way. Sorry.
I use to think that Omar was a real jerk, but I gain more appreciation for him all the time. I think he was knee-jerk contrary to many of the artists village folks before, but maybe he is a little different now.
The only reason why somebody would find Omar’s mural article boring is because it is actually technical. It is probably the most technical article written on this subject yet. It can probably be used as a guideline for creating city process with regards to all of this public wall space stuff.
If somebody wants She Said-She Said Drama articles then there are other blogs where that can be found.
Omar is a smart guy. We are happy to post excertps of his work and send more readers his way.
But we like the novela approach too. Aye Dios mio! LOL!