It is looking like the City of Santa Ana is going to outsource its fire department, to the Orange County Fire Authority, saving over ten million per year. Some of my readers are asking why we can’t just negotiate those savings with the Santa Ana Benevolent Firemen’s Association. My sources at City Hall are telling me that the union won’t cooperate.
So why not outsource the award-winning Santa Ana Police Department too? Simple. The Santa Ana Police Officers Association is cooperating and savings are expected to be over ten million a year – and quite possibly as high as thirteen million a year. It doesn’t hurt that our Chief of Police, Paul Walters, is also now our Acting City Manager! He knows his police budget better than anyone.
How important are our police, to our community? Well, a recent study identified that communities get a lot of bang for their buck, when they hire police officers. Here is a recap of that study, from an L.A. Times editorial by Greg Ridgeway and Paul Heaton, published on Nov. 22 of this year:
At a recent Capitol Hill rally for the administration’s job creation bills, Vice President Joe Biden urged America to hire more police — even in this era of austerity — or accept that crime will increase.
His point is worth considering. Although crime in the United States on average has shown a historic decline since the early 1990s, a recent Rand Corp. report shows that a 10% increase in the size of a police force decreases the rate of homicide by 9%, robbery by 6% and vehicle theft by 4% each year. (The effect on rates of sexual assault is less clear.)
And crime is expensive to communities, businesses and victims.
Each homicide costs a community an average of $8 million, according to reliable cost-of-crime studies. At that rate, Los Angeles’ homicides cost it more than $4 billion in 2006, or 2% of the city’s total economic output. That bottom line includes obvious costs of crime: adjudication, coroners, medical costs and incarceration. Rand also figured in a factor for the intangible costs of victims’ pain and suffering.
The high cost of crime to society suggests that adding police officers may give large cities a sizable return on their investments.
Rand’s cost-of-crime calculator can estimate that return for a given community.
For example, in L.A. there were 480 homicides in 2006, when the city started an initiative to expand its force. Since then the force has grown by 8%, or 725 police officers. Homicides dropped to 293 by 2010. With homicide rates already in decline, it would be hard to credit all of the decrease to a bigger police force. But our research suggests that the added police can account for 7% of the 480, or 35 fewer homicides. That’s $280 million in crime costs saved.
The 725 extra police cost Los Angeles about $110 million annually. When Rand researchers factored in all serious crimes averted by adding those police officers, savings to citizens in the city came to $415 million a year, a 280% return on investment. The savings don’t accrue solely to the city but also to the individuals and businesses that would otherwise bear the costs of crime. Taxpayers indeed appear to be getting their money’s worth for investing in an enhanced police force.
Other major U.S. cities could learn from L.A.’s example. Where police departments are small and crime burdens are large, taxpayers could reap a good return on investment by adding police officers. Rand research shows that one additional officer could reduce crime costs by $600,000 a year in Houston, Atlanta, Oklahoma City, Miami, Baltimore and Kansas City.
In the particularly understaffed police departments of Oakland and St. Louis, each additional officer could reduce crime costs by more than $1 million a year. In Flint, Mich., where the vice president originally pitched for more cops, each additional officer could save $4 million a year in crime costs to the community.
However, police investments don’t make sense everywhere. Cities where police departments are big and crime rates relatively low might not see reductions that exceed the costs of new officers’ training, salary and benefits. Such cities include El Paso; Honolulu; Madison, Wis., and Boise, Idaho.
“SOURCES”, what sources?
FBA hasn’t meet for over a month because the last 3 negociation meetings that were set up have been cancelled by the CITY of Santa Ana. Walters, City Negociators, City Council and the City Mayor all wanted to talk to OCFA about out sourceing the FD. IT came from the CITY, 6-0 vote from the Council for a BID. All meetings setup for negociations with the FBA have begin cancelled by the City since the process began.
Also, read the whole bid, not just the dollar and cents…the savings is almost double the $10 million you have stated. Read the bid from top to bottom and you will see why there is no way the City can match the numbers.
The FD cuts “in actual money” (not smoke and mirrors) would be hard money cuts the City will save will last longer than any of us will be alive. The City wanted the FD to cut $8 mill and the whole bid shows it will save the City about $20 million, plus it addresses over 20 of the Management Partners generated cuts. With this, they know it will save jobs in SEIU and positions with SAPD.
Amazing, City Hall sources. Look at the Council minutes. For a city screaming structural change, PD is only offering deferments and no real solutions. Also the City Manager/Police Chief made it clear that the best solution was to dissolve the fire department. So the fire department union has been working hard with the city, the fire authority and all concerned at finding the solution. They have provided structural change with yearly operational cost savings, shadow savings with vehicle replecement and repair, illnees and injury cost, as well as training costs. The fire authority as the sheriff’s department saves the city millions…. PD wants fire gone, cause that opens up the money for them, look at a police officer’s salary, without overtime. Nearly $10,000 a month, not including benne’s. The fire union at their security is providing structural change, and will be paying more for their benefits, receiving less money. Why….. to maintain a service level and prevent anybody from being laid off. The fire union has been cooperating, the PD and city wants you to think they haven’t….funny they have everytime. Really what union has met the goals of the city study from Management Partners? Not PD, Not general employees, fire union is trying. Look at the city negotion contract under the city council minutes…. not a source, but written answers!
This is way after the fact and no one is probably never going to see this, But this article is bullshit! Paul “ASSHOLE Walters lied and tossed the SAFD out like the trash. Our association has given concessions back to the city for the last five years. The SAPD
just got a 3% raise before this was written the Fire Dept has not had any increases for five 5 years. The cops are really giving back aren’t they. Well we are in the trash heap of history now so Santa Ana Can wallow in the disaster they created for themselves and we as new ocfa employees will be looking for a happier future without the idiot
santa ana city steering the ship.