Sat. Dec 21st, 2024

SANTA ANA, Calif. – A former Orange County Sheriff’s deputy has pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of filing a false police report in connection with failing to properly book evidence. An Orange County superior court judge agreed to reduce the felony to a misdemeanor over the objection of prosecutors.

Edwin Morales Mora, 45, was indicted on August 5, 2020 by a grand jury on one felony count of filing a false police report.

On August 30, 2017, Mora, while employed as an Orange County Sheriff’s deputy, knowingly wrote and filed a false police report that stated he booked a knife, methamphetamine, and a glass smoking pipe into the Sheriff’s evidence locker in Santa Ana. He never booked the evidence.

Mora is no longer employed by the Orange County Sheriff’s Department.

Mora is the third former Orange County Sheriff’s deputy to be convicted of lying in police reports as a result of the fallout of an Orange County Sheriff’s Department audit that revealed systematic evidence booking issues.

Joseph Anthony Atkinson, Jr., 39, and Bryce Richmond Simpson, 31, each pleaded guilty on June 5, 2020 to one misdemeanor count of willful omission to perform their official duty. Atkinson and Simpson were both sentenced to one year informal probation.

Simpson became an Orange County Sheriff’s Deputy in 2012. Atikinson was hired in April 2013. Neither is currently employed by the Orange County Sheriff’s Department.

In mid-November 2019, District Attorney Todd Spitzer became aware of the extent of evidence booking issues within the Orange County Sheriff’s Department (OCSD) and the existence of department-wide internal audits. District Attorney Spitzer had not been made aware of the extent of these audits previously and only became aware of the matter on November 15, 2019 when he was informed about it from a local newspaper reporter.

Upon learning of the full extent of the audits, District Attorney Spitzer immediately requested additional information from the Sheriff’s Department about potentially impacted criminal cases to ensure that the District Attorney’s Office was able to “identify any and all cases handled by the OCDA where a defendant’s due process rights may have been negatively impacted by having evidence collected but not booked.”

District Attorney Spitzer also directed two senior prosecutors to oversee the office’s response. Because of the deficiencies in the Sheriff’s audit, District Attorney Spitzer ordered a hand-search of all cases resulting in a conviction over a three-year period – from March 2015 to March 2018 – to determine if there were cases where evidence was collected but not booked.

A total of 22,289 cases were reviewed by a joint team of OCSD and DA investigators

  • 3,639 notifications made to defense attorneys in potentially impacted cases (both active and closed cases)
  • Charges were reduced or dismissed in 67 cases
  • Two former OCSD deputies have been convicted of a misdemeanor for failing to properly book evidence
  • A third former OCSD deputy has been convicted of a misdemeanor for filing a false police report.
  • All DNA profiles related to potentially impacted cases identified in the Sheriff’s Department evidence booking audit will be expunged from the OCDA DNA database

The OCDA reports on the Sheriff’s Department Evidence Booking Issues can be found here.

In 2020, District Attorney Spitzer re-opened the criminal investigation of Simpson, Atkinson, Mora and the 14 other Orange County Sheriff’s deputies accused of not properly booking evidence after personally reviewing each file himself. Sixteen of the deputies have been added to the District Attorney’s Brady Notification System. Brady v. Maryland requires prosecutors to disclose to the defense any material exculpatory evidence, including evidence that could be used to impeach police witnesses.

As a result of the additional review, the District Attorney’s Office hired veteran prosecutor Patrick K. O’Toole as a special prosecutor to review the 17 cases and determine if criminal charges were warranted. O’Toole served as the United States Attorney of the Southern District of California and as the head of the San Diego District Attorney’s Public Integrity Division.

“The public has an absolute expectation that their law enforcement officers will carry out their duties lawfully and truthfully,” said Orange County District Attorney Todd Spitzer. “When law enforcement officers falsify reports and break the law, it deprives defendants and victims of their constitutional rights, jeopardizes the criminal justice system, and erodes the public trust. As soon as I was made aware of this situation, I immediately took action to ensure the rights of victims and defendants were safeguarded and to hold those who violated the law accountable.”

author avatar
Art Pedroza Editor
Our Editor, Art Pedroza, worked at the O.C. Register and the OC Weekly and studied journalism at CSUF and UCI. He has lived in Santa Ana for over 30 years and has served on several city and county commissions. When he is not writing or editing Pedroza specializes in risk control and occupational safety. He also teaches part time at Cerritos College and CSUF. Pedroza has an MBA from Keller University.

By Art Pedroza

Our Editor, Art Pedroza, worked at the O.C. Register and the OC Weekly and studied journalism at CSUF and UCI. He has lived in Santa Ana for over 30 years and has served on several city and county commissions. When he is not writing or editing Pedroza specializes in risk control and occupational safety. He also teaches part time at Cerritos College and CSUF. Pedroza has an MBA from Keller University.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.