I met a week or so ago with Paul Walters, the Chief at the Santa Ana Police Department, and two of his top police officers. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the DUI checkpoints that the SAPD conducts, as it turns out, twice a month. You can see all of the checkpoints mapped out in the graphic above.
I was upset when the SAPD recently conducted a DUI checkpoint at Rosita Park, a sleepy immigrant neighborhood on the west side. It seemed like terrible timing given the effort, currently underway, to conduct the 2010 U.S. Census.
The SAPD uses grants from the State of California to conduct the DUI checkpoints. As you might imagine, the police officers like doing this as they get paid massive overtime.
There are several considerations with regard to where the SAPD stages the checkpoints. For one thing, they need to do them in areas where they can stage all their vehicles, and where they can keep their officers safe.
The SAPD keeps track of their DUI checkpoints and they try to move them around the city. However, it looks like, in hindsight, they have missed much of north Santa Ana and south Santa Ana.
You can see in the graphic above that while the SAPD has conducted DUI checkpoints on major arteries leading into north Santa Ana, they have not staged any DUI checkpoints in the north Santa Ana neighborhoods. Floral Park, where Santa Ana Mayor Miguel Pulido lives, West Floral Park, Morrison Park, Fisher Park, Riverview and Park Santiago have been spared.
In the area we call the South Coast Metro you will find similar results. In the graphic above you can see that South Santa Ana has been almost entirely spared from the DUI checkpoints.
Interesting, isn’t it?
So have the DUI checkpoints accomplished anything?
You can see the results of the 2009 SAPD DUI checkpoints in the graphic above. If I read it correctly, there have been 115 DUI arrests, out of over 17,000 vehicles that have passed through the checkpoints. Of those vehicles, 4,573 were actually screened, on a random basis. Only 125 field sobriety tests have been conducted.
In that same time period, 455 vehicles were impounded. Now you figure that a third of those were the DUI arrests, although in some cases the drivers were allowed to leave their cars at the checkpoint for their family to pick up. But that still left about 300 folks without their cars. They had to pay the City a lot of money to get their cars back!
So is this all worth it? That is hard to say. I did ask Chief Walters if the City does anything to reach out to patrons of local bars, so as to educate them about the dangers of drinking and driving. They don’t. We have more liquor licenses than any other Orange County city. You could argue that our City created the drinking problem, to a certain extent.
The Chief did point out that many folks drink at home or at the homes of family or friends. True enough. As you can see in the graphic above, over a thousand of them were arrested for DUI in 2009.
As our meeting closed, I asked the Chief to please be careful about where they conduct the DUI checkpoints going forward, for the next six to eight months. We need to make sure everyone fills out their Census forms. If we fail to do so, our City, and our residents, will pay the price as our federal funding will shrink.
4 thoughts on “A closer look at the Santa Ana Police Department’s DUI checkpoints”
wow, I really like this one
These statistics are very interesting, if I read them right.
SAPD conducted 14 checkpoints for all of last year. At these checkpoints 17,330 went through the checkpoints with 4573 cars “screened”. Depending on your definition of “screened” it appears about 25% of all cars passing through these checkpoints were “screened”. For the sake of argument I assume “screened” means the driver was spoken to for signs of alcohol, checked for a drivers license and possibly insurance. That sounds pretty efficient until one starts comparing the results.
From these numbers 10% of “screened” drivers had their cars impounded yet only 2.5% were arrested for D.U.I. On the other hand DUI arrests city wide, at 1098, means 24% of all drunk driving arrests were made anywhere. Subtract the 2.5% at the DUI checkpoints and it is clear that these DUI checkpoints are worthless except for money makers on vehicle impounds.
Since the city seems to be able to find thousands of dollars for overtime during summer weekend cruise night enforcement without state money, what’s the deal? The answer is DUI checkpoints are just cash cows and obviously don’t make a difference.
No need to worry about the census, the forms are in the mail, fill it out and return promptly.
The door to door census takers will fan out late April to end of May. Most of the special projects should be completed by June also.
So just get the drunks and dopers off the roads, and impound the unlicensed, unregistered and uninsured cars and keep them off the roads.
Some of those folks driving without a license are soccer moms and dads working two jobs…