Revealed – Pulido busted Palacio’s unethical mentor back in 1990
To understand why SAUSD Trustee John Palacio hates Santa Ana Mayor Miguel Pulido so much you have to understand that Palacio is still mad that his best friend and mentor was booted off a local school board some years ago. Wait a minute – I am not referencing the recall of former SAUSD Trustee Nativo Lopez, but rather the fall from grace and eventual resignation of former Rancho Santiago Community College District Trustee Rodolfo “Rudy” Montejano.
Long before Lopez was causing trouble in town, Montejano was the man. An attorney, who graduated from UC Berkeley, like current Council Member Vince Sarmiento and Council candidate Eric Alderete, Montejano was quite the player back in the day – and Palacio was his number one lackey.
But Montejano, like Lopez, disgraced himself and then he left, only to reappear in far-off Indiana. But before we get to that, let’s recap his career, using media references:
Montejano was first elected to the SAUSD Board of Education back in 1971. By 1985 Latinos could not get elected any longer to that board, according to the L.A. Times.
By 1988, Montejano was on the Rancho Board and he was in the news again. This time he was cited by the L.A. Times as having recused himself from voting on a contract between the Rancho District and the operators of a swap meet that was at the time being held at Santa Ana College. Montejano was referenced as “an associate of Norton Western Ltd., the private corporation that formerly sponsored the swap meets.” Worth noting was the fact that a non-profit run by Montejano, the Santiago Club, was retained in the contract to “provide security, management personnel, restrooms and sanitation.”
In 1989, the L.A. Times connected Palacio to Montejano. “John Palacio, a management consultant in Santa Ana, has been named Latino program adviser for the Pacific Symphony, orchestra officials announced this week. Palacio, formerly Latino affairs manager for Santa Ana and an executive assistant to the city manager, will serve as a part-time consultant to the organization to develop musical programs for the Latino community. The orchestra also has created a Latino advisory committee whose chairman is Rodolfo Montejano, a Santa Ana lawyer who was elected to the orchestra board of directors in January.”
By August of 1990 the wheel were falling off of Montejano’s Cadillac, as the L.A. Times reported “The Orange County Grand Jury is reportedly investigating allegations that Santa Ana attorney and Latino rights activist Rodolfo Montejano tried to improperly pressure City Councilman Miguel A. Pulido Jr. to approve the construction of billboards proposed by one of his clients.” Aha! Palacio’s hatred for Pulido goes all the way back to this incident – which derailed Montejano’s career. Pulido stopped Montejano in his tracks!
By October of 1990, the L.A. Times had reported more about the investigation into Montejano’s lobbying activities: “District attorney’s investigators have questioned three civic leaders about what they discussed or overheard at a private dinner hosted last year by Santa Ana lawyer Rodolfo Montejano, who is the focus of a grand jury inquiry. The gathering took place on the eve of a rock concert at Centennial Regional Park sponsored by a nonprofit organization led by Montejano and co-promoted by one of his clients.”
Two Rancho District employees had finally had enough of Montejano, according to the L.A. Times. “Two faculty members from Rancho Santiago College demanded the resignation of college trustee Rodolfo Montejano during a meeting of trustees Tuesday. Philosophy instructor John A. Velasquez and Librarian Douglas Toohey told the board they believe that Montejano is no longer a proper role model for the college and should step down from the post he has held for 19 years.”
A month later, Montejano cracked. He told the L.A. Times that he was “resigning from the board of an organization that he founded and plans to move to Indiana next year.” He cited health concerns and a desire to “live in a non-urban environment away from crime, drugs, traffic, overcrowding, pollution and congestion, which now dominate our city.” He also announced he was leaving his beloved Santiago Club – which fell apart after he left and no longer exists today.
But the O.C. Grand Jury wasn’t done with Montejano. Santa Ana Planning Commissioner Donald A. Sizemore, told the L.A. Times that he and former Councilman Ron May were invited by Montejano to a dinner at a Reuben’s Restaurant to discuss whether the city Planning Commission and the council would approve construction of a series of oversize billboards being sought by a firm that the lobbyist (Montejano) represented.
And in May of 1991, Montejano was making headlines yet again. The L.A. Times revealed that “former Deputy City Atty. Frank Rhemrev leased space in the office suite of Santa Ana attorney Rodolfo Montejano. As a result of this the city attorney’s office had to postpone a trial involving a lawsuit between the city and Councilman Richards L. Norton. And get this – Rhemrev “also handled about 30 zoning and municipal-code lawsuits pending against catering-truck owners who are represented by Montejano.”
Later in 1991, Rancho Santiago Trustee Charles W. (Pete) Maddox accused fellow trustee Montejano of “unethical behavior in filing campaign financial statements and in his dealings with the college’s now-defunct swap meet,” according to the L.A. Times. Maddox pushed for a Code of Ethics for the Rancho Board that was approved by the Trustees.
Montejano finished his time on the Rancho Board in September of 1991, according to the L.A. Times. Rancho Trustee Charles Maddox, a former student journalist who dogged Montejano for years, summed up the retiring Trustee’s career thusly: “In terms of the district and the community, I see Rudy’s career as a tragedy,” Maddox said. “We have this brilliant leader with all this talent who, in my opinion, put all of that talent in the wrong direction. What I’ve seen is a man who came from poverty, grew to social prominence then took advantage of those he left behind.” Maddox is especially critical of Montejano’s role in El Mercado, a privately run swap meet that operated for three years in the parking lot of the college’s Santa Ana campus. “Montejano’s involvement in the swap meet was the dirtiest political event ever to take place in Santa Ana,” Maddox charged. The swap meet, which served mostly Latino customers, was operated by the Santiago Club which contracted with Norton Western Ltd., a company owned by City Councilman Richards L. Norton. The Santiago Club, Norton Western and the college split portions of the proceeds earned from the swap meet–an arrangement which Maddox contended was a conflict of interest.
But the hard times were not over for Montejano. In February of 1992, according to the L.A. Times, “A Superior Court jury Monday ordered retired Rancho Santiago College trustee and local lawyer Rodolfo Montejano to pay more than $1.7 million in damages to a former client who had charged him with fraud and misrepresentation.”
And the Rancho Board was still dealing with Montejano’s alleged unethical behavior. The Board passed a ban on alcohol for Trustees who were charging dinner meetings to the District. Trustee Charles Maddox “first proposed and wrote the policy after noticing a $2,545 bill at the Antonello Ristorante in Santa Ana for four nights of board activities there in August, 1991. The bill included a $413.75 tab for alcoholic beverages,” according to the L.A. Times.
Remember how Montejano said he was moving and retiring due to his health? That turned out to be a load of B.S. He never stopped working – he just moved to a different arena, perhaps ahead of the Grand Jury posse that was still going after him. In 2008, Montejano, who has been with the Evansville Vanderburgh School Corp. for less than a year as director of development, was promoted Monday to the school system’s No. 2 administrative spot, according to an online source.
Palacio of course never lost touch with Montejano. He included him on an online list of endorsers in 2010.
Palacio is now following in Montejano’s footsteps – which the aforementioned recalled SAUSD Trustee Nativo Lopez tried to do as well. Palacio is backing Santa Ana Councilman David Benavides, who is a hot mess, for the Santa Ana Mayor’s office, and Palacio is also involved in the Nelida Yanez and Mark McLoughlin campaigns for the Rancho Board and the Valerie Amezcua campaign for the SAUSD School Board.
And Palacio is still working the non-profits for his own benefit, as Montejano, his godfather, did. He called himself a “management consultant” after the City of Santa Ana fired him. Today he is involved in HEEF, the Hispanic Education Endowment Fund. You won’t find his name on their financial reports but go to their annual dinner and you will see that he is the man at HEEF. I wonder how much of the corporate loot they rake in every year ends up in his pockets?
He must be doing pretty well as he has a house here in town in the Morrison Park neighborhood, not too far from Santa Ana Council Member Carlos Bustamante’s house. And he maintains a second home in Arizona.
Most folks in town have forgotten about Montejano, but we haven’t. And you shouldn’t either. We can still stop Palacio from becoming the next Montejano – be sure to vote against every single candidate he is supporting, this November.
Art PedrozaEditor
Our Editor, Art Pedroza, worked at the O.C. Register and the OC Weekly and studied journalism at CSUF and UCI. He has lived in Santa Ana for over 30 years and has served on several city and county commissions. When he is not writing or editing Pedroza specializes in risk control and occupational safety. He also teaches part time at Cerritos College and CSUF. Pedroza has an MBA from Keller University.
Our Editor, Art Pedroza, worked at the O.C. Register and the OC Weekly and studied journalism at CSUF and UCI. He has lived in Santa Ana for over 30 years and has served on several city and county commissions. When he is not writing or editing Pedroza specializes in risk control and occupational safety. He also teaches part time at Cerritos College and CSUF. Pedroza has an MBA from Keller University.
Lomeli is reaching Greg Diamond like proportions in his BLIND defense of anything democratic/Benavides.
The common demonator, both aparantly have endless time on thier hands, Neither live in the communities they insert themselves in, nor can they VOTE there. Additionally, both are completely ignorant to the facts.
Is Dr. Lomeli part of the DPOC too? I didn't think that dentists and lawyers were part of the OCEA.
Editor says:
August 31, 2012 at 3:29 pm
You are right. Palacio does associate with a lot of scumbags. Why is that?
I don't know that he does. You saying so those not make it fact. I can say you and Pulido associate with a lot of scumbags does it make it true or is true?
Say what you want about Pulido but drag me into this and you will regret it.
Carpetbagger,
I am a registered Republican. Just commenting on political witch hunts.
Most of Montejano's crew were Republicans. Wasn't he a Nixon appointee? You would have fit right in.
Probably not a good fit for me. Some of your friends tell me you bragged to them that Pulido and Claudia Alvarez pay for you to write on your blog in their favor . Want names? Will be surprised if you post this.
No friend of mine would say that. It simply isn't true. On occasion I get paid to design websites. That is true. In fact I did that for Michele Martinez two years ago. I have never worked with Alvarez but would be honored to do so.
Editor says:
August 31, 2012 at 3:58 pm
Say what you want about Pulido but drag me into this and you will regret it.
Pedroza is this a threat. You wish to fight me ( mano a mano ).Why do you post rumors and character assassination on people and take great insult when association with scumbags is asked of you?
I take great care when posting to establish my points. I certainly dis so with the Montejano post, with over a dozen links to media references.
As a blogger I do share my opinions. That is what blogging is all about. Feel free to take umbrage with said opinions. But calling what I write rumors is off-base.
Over and over again you insist on making this personal and attacking me. When you comment here you are a guest and if you insist on attacking me then I will have no choice but to show you the door. Don't like that? Then go start your own blog and let me know how that works out for you. This is not as easy as you appear to think it is.
I understand your rules. However I did not attack you. I am not questioning your research on Montejano as it is irrelevant just fodder for a political witch hunt.
Your blog pieces on the Mayoral race include character assassinations of individuals. You call it sharing your opinions. Others that share their opinion about you that you find offensive you call it an attack on your character. This is not fair and hypocritical. You say it is your blog and you have these unfair rules, well OK I have to be carefull notbto anger you in oder to blog here.
Again, if Benavides wants to clear the air about the rumors BROUGHT UP BY MY READERS, he is welcome to do so.
I wrote a post asking why Benavides no longer mentions his family on ANY of his Facebook pages and websites. It is a damn good question that he ought to answer ASAP.
Running you out to cover up for these people only works to a certain extent. Benavides and Palacio are adults and they are seasoned politicians. Stand up gentlemen and speak for yourselves!
"You wish to fight me ( mano a mano )."
This sounds like a money making Pay per View event Art! Some O.C. Register reporters put on the gloves recently for charity and it drew some interest. How about the loser has to wear a Sandwich Board sign walking on 4th street supporting the winners candidate of choice?
LOL! Dr. Lomeli is a nice older man. I would not want to injure him or anyone else for that matter. And I do my fighting from a keyboard, not with fists.
The last time I got in a fist fight was in the fourth grade, when I beat up a white kid for picking on the only African American student at my school. I won.
Benavidez has nothing to explain to you or your readers. His marriage is private. Like many of us in a marriage we encounter significant martial problems that require time away from each other to heal differences.
Why the joy in others private problems? Marital problems are irrelevant in his ability
Palacio won't answer you as he has no involvement in th ecouncil majority strategy. He does not drive the " spring revolution". The united Pulido independant council majority does.
Santa Ana Proud,
My prediction is Pedroza down in 1. Pedroza is out of shape. One in the gut will do it.
It figures that you would be open to such a ridiculous idea.
“To fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting.” - Sun Tzu, The Art of War.
Your ego gets in the way. Your answer to me and Santa Ana Proud should of been. My post was not a threat for a physical altercation should not of said what I said . This is a blog and I support free speech.
Instead you say you can hurt me in a fight because I am old,and so will do your damage from a keyboard.........cowardly.
Understand that if you attack enough people by keyboard sooner or later you may run into someone that will not be rational and seek you out to harm you. We have differences but I always have consider you a friend in this manner I mention this.
All this is politics it is not important in the big picture of life.
I have always fought hard for our people. I will continue to do so despite the bullies on the left and the right.
View Comments
Lomeli is reaching Greg Diamond like proportions in his BLIND defense of anything democratic/Benavides.
The common demonator, both aparantly have endless time on thier hands, Neither live in the communities they insert themselves in, nor can they VOTE there. Additionally, both are completely ignorant to the facts.
Is Dr. Lomeli part of the DPOC too? I didn't think that dentists and lawyers were part of the OCEA.
Editor says:
August 31, 2012 at 3:29 pm
You are right. Palacio does associate with a lot of scumbags. Why is that?
I don't know that he does. You saying so those not make it fact. I can say you and Pulido associate with a lot of scumbags does it make it true or is true?
Say what you want about Pulido but drag me into this and you will regret it.
Carpetbagger,
I am a registered Republican. Just commenting on political witch hunts.
Most of Montejano's crew were Republicans. Wasn't he a Nixon appointee? You would have fit right in.
Probably not a good fit for me. Some of your friends tell me you bragged to them that Pulido and Claudia Alvarez pay for you to write on your blog in their favor . Want names? Will be surprised if you post this.
No friend of mine would say that. It simply isn't true. On occasion I get paid to design websites. That is true. In fact I did that for Michele Martinez two years ago. I have never worked with Alvarez but would be honored to do so.
Editor says:
August 31, 2012 at 3:58 pm
Say what you want about Pulido but drag me into this and you will regret it.
Pedroza is this a threat. You wish to fight me ( mano a mano ).Why do you post rumors and character assassination on people and take great insult when association with scumbags is asked of you?
I take great care when posting to establish my points. I certainly dis so with the Montejano post, with over a dozen links to media references.
As a blogger I do share my opinions. That is what blogging is all about. Feel free to take umbrage with said opinions. But calling what I write rumors is off-base.
Over and over again you insist on making this personal and attacking me. When you comment here you are a guest and if you insist on attacking me then I will have no choice but to show you the door. Don't like that? Then go start your own blog and let me know how that works out for you. This is not as easy as you appear to think it is.
I understand your rules. However I did not attack you. I am not questioning your research on Montejano as it is irrelevant just fodder for a political witch hunt.
Your blog pieces on the Mayoral race include character assassinations of individuals. You call it sharing your opinions. Others that share their opinion about you that you find offensive you call it an attack on your character. This is not fair and hypocritical. You say it is your blog and you have these unfair rules, well OK I have to be carefull notbto anger you in oder to blog here.
Again, if Benavides wants to clear the air about the rumors BROUGHT UP BY MY READERS, he is welcome to do so.
I wrote a post asking why Benavides no longer mentions his family on ANY of his Facebook pages and websites. It is a damn good question that he ought to answer ASAP.
Running you out to cover up for these people only works to a certain extent. Benavides and Palacio are adults and they are seasoned politicians. Stand up gentlemen and speak for yourselves!
"You wish to fight me ( mano a mano )."
This sounds like a money making Pay per View event Art! Some O.C. Register reporters put on the gloves recently for charity and it drew some interest. How about the loser has to wear a Sandwich Board sign walking on 4th street supporting the winners candidate of choice?
LOL! Dr. Lomeli is a nice older man. I would not want to injure him or anyone else for that matter. And I do my fighting from a keyboard, not with fists.
The last time I got in a fist fight was in the fourth grade, when I beat up a white kid for picking on the only African American student at my school. I won.
Benavidez has nothing to explain to you or your readers. His marriage is private. Like many of us in a marriage we encounter significant martial problems that require time away from each other to heal differences.
Why the joy in others private problems? Marital problems are irrelevant in his ability
Palacio won't answer you as he has no involvement in th ecouncil majority strategy. He does not drive the " spring revolution". The united Pulido independant council majority does.
Santa Ana Proud,
My prediction is Pedroza down in 1. Pedroza is out of shape. One in the gut will do it.
It figures that you would be open to such a ridiculous idea.
“To fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting.” - Sun Tzu, The Art of War.
Your ego gets in the way. Your answer to me and Santa Ana Proud should of been. My post was not a threat for a physical altercation should not of said what I said . This is a blog and I support free speech.
Instead you say you can hurt me in a fight because I am old,and so will do your damage from a keyboard.........cowardly.
Understand that if you attack enough people by keyboard sooner or later you may run into someone that will not be rational and seek you out to harm you. We have differences but I always have consider you a friend in this manner I mention this.
All this is politics it is not important in the big picture of life.
I have always fought hard for our people. I will continue to do so despite the bullies on the left and the right.