Susan Mercer, the President of the Santa Ana Educators’ Association (SAEA) has sent out an email to her members regarding the placement of six schools in the Santa Ana Unified School District (SAUSD) in the California “Persistently Low Performing” schools list.
Once a school gets on this list, the school district has to take incredible measures to get back in compliance with the state. These include changing school administrators and reassigning teachers.
Here is Mercer’s email message:
On March 11, the California State Board of Education added an additional thirty-eight schools to the 188 “Persistently Low Performing” schools identified during the prior week. Century, Valley and Willard were identified during the first round and Santa Ana High, Saddleback and Sierra were added to the list last Thursday.
Despite not receiving Race to the Top funds, the new legislation has put huge pressure on all teachers. I have experienced first hand teachers blaming other teachers. During this difficult time of uncertainty we need to stand united. The blame needs to be placed where it belongs: the California Legislature who is trying to tell us how to do our jobs without any understanding or knowledge of teaching or the needs of our students.
Last week the SAEA Executive Board had an emergency meeting to discuss this issue and the Bargaining Team met for two full days to review and analyze the impact of this legislation on Santa Ana teachers and developed plan of action. On Monday, the SAEA Board of Directors will review the plan, revise it and if approved, will present it to Rep Council on Tuesday.
CTA is reviewing the legal implication of this legislation and the impact the different models will cause once implemented. (Below is the email I sent last week describing the different models.)
In addition, on Friday, SAEA met with the District and reiterated the need to work together. On Tuesday, I will be meeting with Jane Russo, Superintendent, and Juan Lopez, Associate Superintendent to discuss the District’s plan and time-lines.
I want to reiterate what I said last week. You will hear many rumors: they are only that…. rumors. At this point no decisions have been made regarding what model will be implemented, if or how transfers will occur, length of the duty day, etc. As of now nothing has been decided.
SAEA will keep you informed and be assured we are working hard to protect and defend you and your rights during these challenging times.
Susan Mercer
President, SAEA
_____________________________________________________________________
And here is a previous note from Mercer:
Last Friday, March 5, District Administration had an emergency meeting with the staff at Willard Intermediate, Valley High School and Century High School to inform them that the State of California has identified these schools as a Persistently Low Performing.
The State of California identified and labeled one hundred schools statewide as Persistently Low Performing. The complete list will be made public during the week of March 8th.
For the 2010-11 school year, these hundred schools, including the three in Santa Ana, need to implement one of the following corrective action models:
1. Turnaround: includes replacing the principal and 50% of the teaching staff.
2. Transformation: includes replacing the principal and increasing instructional time.
3. Restart: school closes and reopens as a charter school.
4. Closure: school closes and students are enrolled in other schools.
The District, SAEA, site administrators and staff will be working together in the development of a plan to be submitted to the State by June 1, 2010. As of now we don’t know what the plan will look like.
You will hear many rumors: they are only that…. rumors. At this point no decisions have been made regarding what model will be implemented, how transfers will occur, length of the duty day, etc.
SAEA will keep you informed as things develop. Please check our web site for updates sateach.org
If you have additional questions please call me at 714-542-6758 or email me at saeapresident@hotmail.com.
Susan Mercer
President, SAEASanta Ana Educators’ Association
2107 N Broadway, Suite 305
Santa Ana, CA 92706
Tilly’s Life Center’s (TLC) recently raised over half a million dollars to support their youth…
On November 25, 2024, at approximately 1:46 PM, Fullerton Fire and Police personnel responded to…
OCFA fire crews responded to two significant vehicle accidents in Garden Grove last Friday, requiring…
On November 24th, 2024, at approximately 1:00 a.m. Newport Beach Fire Department units NE63, NT63,…
‼️UPDATE‼️ Earlier today, our robbery detectives arrested November 20, 2024, #WantedWednesday suspect Izaya Cuellar (35)…
Late Friday night, police officers responded to Balearic Park regarding a vehicle doing “donuts” on…
This website uses cookies.
View Comments
SAHS teacher posts ... "education here that prepares them to compete with America’s best. The problem is the disturbing number of students who reject the educational opportunities that definitely exist here, and will fail to graduate."
Yes, it is entirely the students fault.
There's a major disconnect and you fail to get it!
Why is it that the SAUSD teacher generally pines that they are nt responsibility for the chronic lack of underperforming at the schools.
Your attitude is condescending.
I am a parent-Bring it on.
Don't put the blame on Fundamental. It's too bad there are not more schools that are Fundamental! My kids went to Fundamental schools! My kids will graduate from Fundamental schools! I am a proud parent who stands behind other parents who are for the Fundamental system. We are there to continue to push for these schools. Give me a break.. "The state is not looking into the way Fundamental Schools are effects the rest of the schools" I will say it again: FUNDAMENTAL SCHOOLS ARE NOT THE PROBLEM. I am a parent. I am proud to have my kids at a fundamental school. It's funny how noe the blame is being put on these schools now. Hmmm. Fix the problem..and the problem is not the fundamental schools.
parentwhoispissed,
My kids all went to fundamental schools, except for my now thirteen year old.
It worked out well for my 17 and 19 year old kids. The latter is now in college. The former is an honors student.
But fundamental schools aren't for everyone. We need to ensure other parents have good options available too.
Parent who is Pissed -
Bring it on. What kind of attitude is that?
The problem I have with fundamental schools is based on how they came about. These school were implemented to cut down on the white flight of 25 years ago. It was a way of appeasing the white parents when the color of the school population started to change. the distinction between the fundamental and non-fundamental schools has a tinge of academic superiority. This was fueled by the former lottery system practiced for several years. And as you know, the CA courts intervened ruling it against the law.
This is my beef with the two-tiered school structure.
School board member Hernandez addressed the class system of the fundamental schools at last night's school board meeting.
Santiago parents are asking Santiago to go fundamental and they want their children to be automatically accepted into Mendez since they reside within the alleged school boundaries.
This is the problem w/a 2-tier school system in place. Sooner or later parents perceive that attending a non-fundamental school is "inferior."
Students are lazy and it is getting worse. They refuse to read. They refuse to write. There is no motivating them and there are no consequences that will motivate them. This is true for about one third of the classes. They do not pay attention in class. They do not take notes. They do not study unless they are hand held and spoon fed.